Tall & Rich

A Yanqui’s View of Latin American Politics

Archive for July, 2007

Hugo Chavez; uber-moonbat

Posted by Jonn Lilyea on July 25, 2007

Picture from Venezuela Llora, Venezuela Sangra

The noose around the collective neck of Venezuelans seems to be tightening. An Associated Press story quotes Chavez in a personal ad hominem attack on a Honduran cardinal;

President Hugo Chavez called a cardinal from Honduras an “imperialist clown” after the Roman Catholic prelate warned of increasing authoritarianism under the Venezuelan leader.

“Another parrot of imperialism appeared, this time dressed as a cardinal. That’s to say, another imperialist clown,” Chavez was quoted as saying in a bulletin posted Tuesday on the state-run news agency’s Web site.

Chavez — a close ally of Cuba’s Fidel Castro — was responding to criticism from Honduran Cardinal Oscar Andres Rodriguez Maradiaga, who said in a recent interview cited by Venezuela’s Bolivarian News Agency that Chavez “thinks he’s God and can trample upon other people.”

Chavez made the comments during a government event late Monday. He has repeatedly clashed with Catholic Church leaders in Venezuela, calling them “liars” and “perverts,” but he rarely targets high-ranking priests abroad.

Clowns, liars and perverts. That’s real grown up. Kind of like when he made the “smell of sulfur” comment at the UN about our President. But, the mask is off Hugo now - since he’s been granted “continuous reelection”, the Orwellian term he uses to describe his seizure of the office of Venezuela’s president for the remainder of his life, it seems he can’t be stopped.

Tank at Venezuela Llora, Venezuela Sangra does an excellent piece on the new Culture of Personality growing up in Venezuela around Hugo in true Maoist/Stalinist style, including action figures of the stumpy little dictator. 

Daniel at Venezuela News and Views found an article from Foreign Policy that reports that Venezuela’s bolivar is one of the five worst currencies in the world in which to invest - as a result of Chavez’ communistic social and monetary policies;

With massive public spending fueling inflation and President Hugo Chávez’s nationalization campaign triggering a massive outflow of capital, it’s been a bad year for the bolívar. Thanks mainly to the high price of oil, many of Venezuela’s economic fundamentals look sound. But Venezuela’s currency has lost 21 percent of its value since January 2007….  

The Devil’s Excrement records a conversation betweeen a community leader and Chavez when the community leader tries to tell Hugo that his advisors are lying to him about conditions in Venezuela. Tinpot Hugo doesn’t want to hear it, of course.

Julia at The End of Venezuela as I Know It reports that the only way to organize protests these days is by text messaging since the Venezuelan media has fallen under the jackboot of Chavez and his minions.

At Novosti, Hugo is quoted sounding a bit like the wistful Democrats before the 2000 election when they wished Bill Clinton could run again;

Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez has said he will soon submit to parliament a bill allowing the president to be re-elected an unlimited number of times.

“If people don’t vote for me, I will leave. I’m not trying to hold onto this place, as I have always said. I won’t cry if I am rejected,” Chavez told the Hello President TV show Sunday.

“If the Venezuelan people say go, I will go,” he said.

Venezuela’s leader is elected by a simple majority by a direct national vote and is the head of state and government for six years, and can be re-elected once.

Chavez first pledged to change the number of allowable presidential terms after he won the presidential election in December 2006.

“I think the country’s Constitution should be changed. This first of all concerns presidential terms. We have no right to deprive people of the possibility of electing a leader they like for a fourth, fifth or sixth term,” he said.

Yet, John Edwards and Barack Obama announced the other day during their debate that they’d meet with Chavez (and Castro) according to the Miami Herald (commentary from Babalu Blog). Since Hugo counts Edwards supporter Danny Glover among his pals, there’s absolutely no doubt that they would.

Despite Chavez guarentees to Venezuelans that their private property rights would be protected by his revolution, he left enough wiggle room in his remarks to steal opponents private property (like he did with RCTV) in the style of Robert Mugabe;

President Hugo Chavez assured private property owners their rights will be guaranteed in Venezuela under a pending constitutional reform, as long as proprietors and investors respect the law.
 
“Our socialism accepts private property,” Chavez said in comments published Sunday on the Web site of Union Radio. “It’s only that this private property must be within the framework of the constitution.”

He did not elaborate, saying only that he would present his proposal to lawmakers in the coming weeks. Few details have emerged from a committee Chavez has appointed to draft the proposed overhaul.

Critics accuse Chavez of steering this oil-rich South American nation toward Cuba-style communism, and many wealthy Venezuelans fear second homes, yachts or other assets could be seized.

Chavez denies copying Havana’s economic model, and counters that Venezuela’s socialist reforms will merely broaden the concept of ownership.

Just like he did with petroleum and power companies - as long as they did what Hugo wanted them to do, they could continue to do business. Constitutional guarentees mean nothing in Venezuela these days since Chavez can now rule by decree - the Venezuelan Constitution is what Hugo says it is.

Posted in Hugo Chavez, US Foreign Policy | No Comments »

Hugo Chavez barking at the moon again

Posted by Jonn Lilyea on July 23, 2007

I see Hugo is now concerned that non-Venzuelans might criticise him while visiting Venezuela according to AP (by way of Fox News);

President Hugo Chavez said Sunday that foreigners who publicly criticize him or his government while visiting Venezuela will be expelled from the country.

Chavez ordered officials to closely monitor statements made by international figures during their visits to Venezuela — and deport any outspoken critics.

“How long are we going to allow a person — from any country in the world — to come to our own house to say there’s a dictatorship here, that the president is a tyrant, and nobody does anything about it?” Chavez asked during his weekly television and radio program.

The Venezuelan leader’s statements came after Manuel Espino, the president of Mexico’s conservative ruling party, criticized Chavez during a recent pro-democracy forum in Caracas.

That’s odd since Chavez came to the United States last year and said this about our government, according to CNN;

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez tore into his U.S. counterpart and his U.N. hosts Wednesday, likening President Bush to the devil and telling the General Assembly that its system is “worthless.”

“The devil came here yesterday,” Chavez said, referring to Bush, who addressed the world body during its annual meeting Tuesday. “And it smells of sulfur still today.”

Chavez accused Bush of having spoken “as if he owned the world” and said a psychiatrist could be called to analyze the statement.

“As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world. An Alfred Hitchcock movie could use it as a scenario. I would even propose a title: ‘The Devil’s Recipe.’ “

Chavez held up a book by Noam Chomsky on imperialism and said it encapsulated his arguments: “The American empire is doing all it can to consolidate its hegemonistic system of domination, and we cannot allow him to do that. We cannot allow world dictatorship to be consolidated.”

Notice he said “the American empire” not “the Bush empire”…so there is an equivalance. Did President Bush react by expelling Chavez? Did he pass free speech “reforms” like Chavez has done?

So who’s the dictator here? 

Michael Moynihan recalls Daniel Ortega’s similar behavior more than twenty years ago. 

Posted in Hugo Chavez, US Foreign Policy | No Comments »

Chavez’ Bolibanana Revolution marches on

Posted by Jonn Lilyea on July 16, 2007

The Bolivarian Revolution in South America continues to drive the region further into Banana Republic status as the Associated Press reports (by way of the Wall Street Journal) that Evo Morales, Hugo Chavez’ own personal Mini-Me, moves to nationalize the Bolivian railroads;

President Evo Morales announced plans to nationalize Bolivia’s railroads, continuing his administration’s campaign to extend greater state control over key sectors of the Andean nation’s economy.

Speaking at the inauguration of a restored steam train for tourists outside La Paz, Mr. Morales said Sunday he intends to recover control of former state rail company Empresa Nacional de Ferrocarriles, or ENFE, privatized in 1996.

“We must begin the rehabilitation of our railways,” Mr. Morales said, after traveling from the Tiwanaku ruins to Lake Titicaca on the new line. “This inspires us, this obligates us, this is the start of the nationalization of ENFE.”

Yeah, cuz the nationalised industries in the region have been doing so well - take a look at the chart from The Devil’s Excrement in regards to Venezuela’s oil production over the past 17 years. Keep in mind that Chavez has been intervening in oil production since he rose to the Presidency in 1999.

The Houston Chronicle sees no new money for Venezuela’s production development;

But many independent experts caution that the pullout of the two U.S. oil giants could further harm the investment climate in Venezuela. They also question whether its state-run energy company, Petróleos de Venezuela, also known as PDVSA, and its new suitors have the expertise, money and technology to exploit the tarlike heavy oil in the Orinoco basin, which may hold upward of 300 billion barrels of petroleum.

“They’ve got a problem, because new money isn’t coming in,” said David Mares, an expert on Latin American energy issues at the University of California at San Diego. “PDVSA is confident, but I would say it’s based on blind hope.”

Venezuela, like some other countries, is raising taxes and royalties in a time when the oil producers are looking for different ways to maximize revenues.

Taiwan’s CPC oil company is seeking to protect it’s rights in Venezuela;

The state-owned oil company CPC Corporation, Taiwan is going all out to defend its oil exploration rights in Venezuela, CPC Vice General Manager and Spokesman Tsao Ming said Monday.

Daniel at Venezuela News and Views continues to report food shortages of staples like pasta, beef, chicken, milk and sugar. The good news of course, is that there’s plenty of Corn Flakes - is Jerry Seinfeld in charge of food distribution there?

From Venezuela Llora, Venezuela Sangra, we learn that one of the games of the Copa Americana in Caracas was cancelled to prevent a reoccurance of the protests in the first tournament game - on international television. can’t let the world see that the Revolution is failing, can we? 

Chavez’ power grabs continue with his new plan for “community councils” which bypass local governments (which are more than likely opposed to Chavez’ vision of a strong central government);

The discussion was part of a meeting of one of the country’s several hundred new community councils, President Hugo Chávez’s latest, and one of his more controversial, initiatives on the road to what he calls 21st-century socialism.

The councils are small citizen-run groups that theoretically will eventually take the place of mayors, governors, and other municipal and regional representatives and promote grass-roots democracy. Their money comes from various government institutions that fund their small projects; their power is supposed to come from their local roots.

”All power to the community councils,” Chávez said recently. “Power to the people.”

Not all local officials like that idea, and critics say the Chávez government is trying to use the councils to gain even more power in a country of 27 million people where he already controls the courts, congress, and the military.

Similar councils are being launched by Chávez leftist ally in Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega. Saying they are nothing but a Sandinista Party power-grab, several opposition parties have announced plans to strike down the law that created them.

“Grassroots democracy”? How did the governors, mayors and other municipal representatives get into their offices? They were elected by the people they serve. Who are these new “Community Councils” beholden to? Chavez. Chavez appointed them and Chavez can fire them. So what’s “grassroots democracy” about the community councils?

As I predicted months ago, Reuters is now reporting that Venezuelans are seeking exile in the US from Chavez in record numbers (h/t Steve Shickles);

“I have no doubt that the middle class and those with some stake in the old Venezuela have legitimate concerns regarding their future livelihood and in some cases safety as the regime hardens and the state moves into every sphere of economic and social activity,” said Riordan Roett, director of Latin American studies at Johns Hopkins University.

“If you have young children, you want out. If you have assets that have been seized, or may be seized, you want out as quickly as possible,” Roett added. “If you have land that will be expropriated, leave sooner than later. As the alta (upper) bourgeoisie becomes more and more of a target, you want to leave before Hugo Chavez shuts the door.”

The number of U.S. asylum grants put Venezuela in 11th place, well behind nations such as its neighbor, Colombia, and deeply impoverished Haiti. But more Venezuelans were granted asylum last year than were natives of trouble spots like Iraq, a country reeling from nightmarish levels of violence.

All the while, the rest of the world turns a blind eye. I guess it’s just easier to complain about George Bush than it is to try and stop the dismantling of Latin American Republics and headoff the impending enslavement of the Venezuelan people.

Posted in Hugo Chavez, US Foreign Policy | No Comments »

Latin America and the Democrats

Posted by Jonn Lilyea on July 3, 2007

The Gateway Pundit has a great piece today about Democrats playing Russian Roulette with our foreign policy in regards to Latin America entitled FARC You! where he catalogues Democrat hypocrisy towards our allies in that region.

The reason it caught my eye is some of the rhetoric I’ve been hearing from the Left in regards to the Bush Administration in Latin America that’s not exactly the truth. For example, Barack Obama has a statement on his senate.gov website that claims the Bush Administration isn’t engaged in Latin America;

I am, however, disappointed that the President has fallen so short in his promise to transform U.S. relations with the Americas. Our regional relationships cannot be properly attended to with one six-day trip, a series of photo opportunities, and some lofty rhetoric on collaboration.

Neglect? Why, just this week, the Bush Administration has finalized trade agreements with Peru, Columbia and Panama - to absolutely no fanfare in the press. because these trade pacts are all opposed by Big Labor. Oh, and they’re good for the US - can’t see the President getting good press over anything can we? These trade agreements give these country the ecomonic power to keep their residents at home instead sending them here as illegal immigrants. (Not to mention, it might drive the price of sugar down far enough that Coca Cola might put sugar in that drink again and make it tasty again)

In Miami this week, Obama said, “It’s not sufficient for us to have Latin American policy based on not liking Hugo Chavez and not liking Fidel Castro.” That’s pretty simplistic rhetoric, actually. The Bush administration has pretty much ignored Chavez and Castro - I don’t see any statements coming out of the White House everytime Banana-brains starts yammering paranoid rants about someone wanting to kill his useless ass. I don’t think anyone in the Administration has even acknowledged that Chavez exists. His own people can deal with him - and Castro - phht - he’ll be dead soon enough, so who cares.

President Bush even travelled around Central and South America in the Fall of 2005 - I left Panama the day before he arrived and it was the talk of the entire country. He’s a very popular figure there, despite the bad press.

Think maybe our stature in Latin America has suffered because Democrats won’t meet with our greatest ally in the region President Alvaro Uribe has been snubbed by the Congressional Democrats as well as Al Gore. This from a Mary Anatasia O’Grady piece in the Wall Street Journal from April entitled “One Righteous Gringo“;

Al Gore may not have known that he was taking the side of a former terrorist and ally of Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chávez when he waded into Colombian politics 10 days ago. But that’s not much consolation to 45 million Colombians who watched their country’s already fragile international image suffer another unjust blow, this time at the hands of a former U.S. vice president.

The event was a climate-change conference in Miami, where Mr. Gore and Colombian President Álvaro Uribe were set to share the stage. At the last minute, Mr. Gore notified the conference organizers that he refused to appear with Mr. Uribe because of “deeply troubling” allegations of human- rights violations swirling around the Colombian government.

It is not clear whether the ex-veep knows that making unsubstantiated claims of human-rights violations has been a key guerrilla weapon for more than a decade, along with the more traditional practices of murdering, maiming and kidnapping civilians. Nor is it clear whether Mr. Gore knew that the recycled charges that caught his attention are being hyped by Colombian Sen. Gustavo Petro, a close friend of Mr. Chávez and former member of the pro-Cuban M-19 terrorist group. What we do know is that Mr. Gore’s line of reasoning — that Colombia is not good enough to rub shoulders with the righteous gringos — is also being peddled by some Democrats in Congress, the AFL-CIO and other forces of anti-globalization. The endgame is all about killing the U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreement.

When Mr. Uribe got wind of Mr. Gore’s decision to stand him up, he rightly interpreted its significance: Colombia is the victim of an international smear campaign that, if left unchecked, could undermine congressional support for the pending trade deal. Rather than let the whispering go on, Mr. Uribe elevated the matter, calling two press conferences over two days to refute the charges, which he says are damaging the country’s interests. He also asked Mr. Gore to look “at Colombia closely” so he could see the progress that has been made.

By the way, President Uribe’s father was killed by terrorists - tough for them if he’s a little harsh in dealing with them. Since when is Al Gore willing to trade our friends down the river because he heard an unsubstantiated rumor somewhere?  

So how exactly is Bush damaging our relations in Latin America? He’s got Democrats undermining his efforts with their petty politics, Democrats winging their way to Venezuela to gladhand with blood-soaked tyrants while they turn their backs on the people who are helping fight our enemies.

Just like in the Middle East where Democrats have tea with our enemies and snub our allies. Maybe we have all of these problems because we present a fickle foreign policy - towards all of our allies and our enemies. Our foreign policy is ambiguous because we have 525 ambassadors in Congress - not to mention the ancillary ambassadors who are former presidents and vice-presidents. 

I’m pretty certain that the founding fathers intended that the president be the sole voice of our nation to other nations. Maybe we need to impeach all of these extraneous diplomats floating around the world operating under a false flag.

Posted in Hugo Chavez, Politics, Terror War, US Foreign Policy | No Comments »